Stop? Let it be....
bdquo;Well, so much the better", I laughed. He started to take off his shoes, and take off his shirt as i started to take of my jeans.
"You know, I wore this for you. I stopped him, went over and turned the radio on, and then gave him the show of his life. I was tempted to go down and taste his dick but I didn't think I could wait.
"Not this time. His cock took another Mahur lurch as his eyes were drawn to her sizeable tits and he swore that he could see that her nipples were erect.
One thing about me is I'm a real pervert into some really weird shit.
You do realize he is still working with Trump right? He quit his law-firm job to concentrate on Trump. One of 3 things happened here.
If this is not indoctrination, then what is it?
Which is why we go to the hard evidence.
"these are foreign children forcibly removed from their parents and placed in someone else's custody"
described me perfectly? ha ha I'm not religious you fool.
A poster on this channel makes the claim that Evolution by Natural Selection is not a valid theory because it is untestable and cannot be proved or disproved.
Im having a problem with free will. Its a concept we use to explain why evil exists in the world, but to me it is a half baked idea that no one knows where it came from. Its not in the Bible, other than in reference to 'freewill offerings". So my half baked concept of God would have to be:
Let me guess you have a small yappy dog to match your personality. Like I just wrote I?ve been to many dog parks and have never seen dogs separated. That?s preposterous.
Hold on - Jesus never said that. That was Paul in Ephesians 6:5-7 and Colossians 3:22. Jesus's only interaction with slaves (in the gospels) was to heal them.
The free market offers what are called standards, underwriters and certifications. Anyone desiring to sell his services as a doctor, baker or beautician would be wise to obtain such endorsements.
As a point of reference, Are you using a bible or other religious text as a (or only) source for historical information? I'm not looking to diminish you opinion but just a respectful question.
Standing in your convictions is done in varying ways...some delusional, others based in well thought out, contemplated/quantified facts, truths & realities. Knowing and being able to recognize the difference helps immeasurably. Some folks you agree to disagree with you honor & respect...others you pity. Recognizing the varied shades of grey between black & white is often an exercise in holding oneself accountable for awareness of what you do NOT know and providing for that reality. I find the more effusive, crazed a person gets in a debate/disagreement, is often indicative of how the point you may be making strikes the intended target. I don't need others to agree...I put more value on another's ability/willingness to listen & hear other POV. I also have more respect for those who at least flat out say to my face that they disagree than those who pretend otherwise or remain silent rather than take a stand one way or the other. JMO