Miscellaneous:
rapidtransitcycles.com
1900 W. North Ave. Chicago Il. 60622
Movie Of The Week:
See the Full Lenth Movie Click Here
Scott Whitman Show

    Bicycle mechanic by
    day waiter by night
    actor in hart  Aaron
    Maier plays a sofa in a
    very creative and
    funny online comedy   
    Watch it now click
    here!
Who Created Al Qaeda?









President Jimmy Carter's
National Security
Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski
visiting 'his boy' Bin Laden
President Jimmy Carter's National Security
Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski visiting 'his boy',
Osama Bin Laden, in training with the Pakistan
Army, 1981.Photo originally scanned from the
New York Village Voice. Photo credited to the
Sygma/Corbis Agency, Paris.
Airplane Contrails Boost Global
Warming, Study Suggests
Brian Handwerk
for National Geographic News
June 14, 2006


















Moving flight times from night to day could reduce
air travel's contributions to global warming, a new
study suggests.

Scheduling more daytime flights may lessen the
impact of contrails—the visible streaks of
condensation that many planes leave in their wake.
The role of contrails in climate change is still under
study, but some scientists believe that they
contribute to the greenhouse effect by trapping
heat in Earth's atmosphere.

Nicola Stuber, first author of the study, to be
published in tomorrow's edition of the journal
Nature, suggests that contrails' overall impact on
climate change is similar in scope to that of
aircrafts' carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions over a
hundred-year period.

Aircraft are believed to be responsible for 2 to 3
percent of human CO2 emissions. Like other high,
thin clouds, contrails reflect sunlight back into
space and cool the planet.

However, they also trap energy in Earth's
atmosphere and boost the warming effect, the
study says.

(See National Geographic magazine's "Global
Warning: Signs From Earth.")

Stuber and other scientists believe that the effect
of the contrails is significant.

"On average the greenhouse warming effect
dominates [the effects of contrails]," said Stuber, a
meteorologist at England's University of Reading.
Global Warming and Contrails

This warming effect is far greater for contrails left
by night flights, Stuber added.

"The solar cooling effect [wherein contrails reflect
the sun's rays back into space] only happens
during the day, when the sun is up," she explained.
During the night the greenhouse warming is no
longer balanced, and that is why the contribution
of nighttime flights is so large."

Most commercial airline traffic occurs during
daylight hours.
For example, only one in four United Kingdom
flights is a night flight, but those flights create
some 60 percent of the warming attributed to
contrails, the study reports.

Contrails are artificial clouds that form around the
tiny aerosol particles in airplane exhaust.

They appear only in moist, very cold (less than
40ºF/4ºC) air—usually at altitudes of 5 miles (8
kilometers) or higher.

Some contrails can last for a day or longer, though
they gradually disperse and begin to resemble
natural clouds.

Contrails Mystery

Scientists disagree about the extent of contrails'
climate impact.

"The jury is out on the impact of contrails," said
Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist at NASA's
Langley Research Center in Langley, Virginia.

David Travis, a climatologist at the University of
Wisconsin-Whitewater, notes that some recent
studies suggest that contrails have little impact on
global climate change but have a greater regional
warming impact.
"I prefer to think of contrails as a regional-scale
climate problem, as they are most common in
certain regions of the world, such as western
Europe, eastern and central U.S., and parts of
eastern Asia," he said.

"This is due to a combination of dense air traffic in
these areas and favorable atmospheric conditions
to support contrail persistence once they form."

Because of their locations and short life spans,
contrails are a difficult study subject.

"The greatest impediment to understanding the
contrail impacts on weather and climate is the poor
state of knowledge of humidity in the upper
troposphere [3.8 to 9.3 miles/6 to 15 kilometers in
altitude]," NASA's Minnis said.

"Until we can measure it properly and extensively,
and model it and its interaction with cirrus clouds
and contrails, we will continue to have large
uncertainties about the effect of contrails."

Winter is Contrail Season

At the high altitudes favored by commercial
airlines, the air is much more humid in winter, so
contrails are twice as likely in that season, study co-
author Stuber said.

"We also found that flights between December and
February contribute half of the annual mean
climate warming, even though they account for
less than a quarter of annual air traffic," she said of
her U.K.-based research.

Study leader Piers Forster, of England's University
of Leeds, suggests that contrails' current impact
on the atmosphere is likely to increase as air traffic
grows.

"Aircraft currently only have a small effect on
climate," he said.

"However, the fact that the volume of air traffic is
set to rapidly grow in coming years makes it
important to investigate the effects of contrails on
our climate."

Shifting airline schedules will surely prove far
easier in theory than in reality.

"The problem is that this is not something that can
be done easily," said the University of Wisconsin's
Travis.

"With fuel prices on the rise and airlines going
bankrupt, it is a difficult time to try and convince
airlines to consider issues such as this one."
Chicago's Other great bike shops
& bike websites.
           The Future of Food
    Clear explanation of how
    powerful big companies have
    become. They don’t care about
    the human specy. All they do care
    about is MONEY.


















                                        
Thank You for visiting....
Rink A Dink Productions is a non profit
web site. Dedicated to presenting,,,
free music sources, out side artist, and
most important, posting news stories and
article exposing the New World Order,
and its agenda.
There are no paying advertisers
please make a donation of any amount to
help cover the cost of presenting this
web site.

Please
Disclaimer:                                           
   




ATTENTION:
Rink A Dink Productions
is not affiliated
with Rinkadink Records in any way



thanks
Rink A Dink productions by Ronnie LoBello. A GREAT place for alternative art, music, news and lots of cool links too...
Short Note:
Former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space
defense program in both Republican and
Democratic administrations, who was a senior air
force colonel who flew 101 combat missions, and
who is a Catholic Archbishop stated that  9/11 was
an inside job  (he also said "If our government had
merely done nothing, and allowed normal
procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the
twin towers would still be standing, and thousands
of dead Americans would still be alive.
[That is treason")
More
Radio
Links
Here
<<<<<
Trivia:
Did you know
The Pentagon, a building, institution, and
symbol, was conceived at the request of
Brigadier General Brehon B. Sommervell,
Chief of the Construction Division of the
Office of the Quartermaster General, on a
weekend in mid-July 1941. The purpose was
to provide a temporary solution to the War
Department's critical shortage of space.
The ground breaking ceremony took place on
September 11, 1941. The building was
dedicated on January 15, 1943, nearly 16
months to the day after the ground breaking.
Stop
Telemarketers
from calling you
free
Click Here!
Picture of the Week:
new picture posted frequently
Home page;
See Van Gogh's
Paintings.
The largest collections on
the Internet tons of
information on one of the
worlds greatest artist
Click Here!
Television;
" ... so long as the media are in corporate hands,
the task of social change will be vastly more
difficult, if not impossible ..."
Robert McChesney, journalist and author
Read Ronnie's Rant
Not the best blog on the net,
but its somthing to read
Click Here!
"As long as people are marginalized and
distracted [they] have no way to organize or
articulate their sentiments, or even know that
others have these sentiments. People assume
that they are the only people with a crazy idea in
their heads. They never hear it from anywhere
else. Nobody's supposed to think that. ... Since
there's no way to get together with other people
who share or reinforce that view and help you
articulate it, you feel like an oddity, an oddball. So
you just stay on the side and you don't pay any
attention to what's going on. You look at
something else, like the Superbowl."
Noam Chomsky, American linguist and US media
and foreign policy critic
WHAT ARE CHEMTRAILS? Click Here!
Disclaimer: We believe that all uncredited
images on these pages are in the public
domain. If we have unwittingly infringed
any copyright,
please let us know
We are in Orwellian times when,







anyone who speaks the truth is
considered to be controversial.
Article;            Watch video
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
By Naomi Wolf
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows
there are certain steps that any would-be dictator
must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. And
George Bush and his administration seem to be
taking them all...  Continue Here !
Support Our Troops
doesn't mean to stick a
ribbon on your car...
It means to give real
support to the men and
women  who sacrifice life
and limb.
Learn how to support
those who aren't getting
proper support from the
government who put them
in this situation in the first
place.
NOW!
Support our
troops!
Got a complaint or suggestion?
Write To Rink A Dink Productions
and let me know whats on your mind.
Please let me know about broken links miss
spellings, misinformation etc.
Or  just say hi
Ronnie;
    To contribute to a
    lasting understanding
    between individuals of
    all nations, races,
    creeds and colors
Chicago's Best!    No#1  Great Reviews
Sonia serves up Great Korean dishes at

    Hamburger King
    Restaurant:
    Its not just hamburgers here,
    although the hamburgers are
    really good.. This place doesn't
    look like much from the outside
    but the prices
are reasonable and their Baek Ban, Bi-Bim Bap and Teriyaki is
great as well.
3435 N Sheffield. Ave in (Wriglyville), Chicago
773 281 4452
More about Hamburger King
Click Here!
Amazing! U Must see these videos.
Video:
Martial Law:
Rise of the Police State
Watch It Now!
Legalize marijuana

In New York, we spend about $1 billion on marijuana
enforcement, not including long-term jailing. With a
$13 billion budget gap, why not save ourselves the
money and shift to a legalization, regulation and
taxation policies similar to that of alcohol? There
are also the documented health benefits afforded
to suffering AIDS and cancer patients forced to go
into a dangerous underground market to get what
many feel is their medicine. Luckily, New York is at
least taking the medicinal uses seriously, as shown
by bills in the Assembly (A0576) and Senate (S.
4041-A).

Contact your state legislators. Tell them we cannot
afford current marijuana laws, and urge them to
support their respective bills. As a person
acquainted with two people suffering from cancer, I
believe it's a shame they cannot legally obtain a
drug that has been shown to improve the quality of
life while they go through their treatments.

Shaun Bowen

Owego
Confronting the Surveillance
Society
Talk by James Bamford author of "The Puzzle
Palace" and "Body of Secrets" & Chris Calabrese
Program Counsel of the ACLU Technology and
Liberty Project
Are We Free?
CURRENT MOON
Obama Supports the Patriot Act
Read This!
FRIENDLY FIRE DEATHS
LINKED TO US PILOTS ON
SPEED
Now they want to drug even more Troops.
Dexedrine Is A ‘Go-Pill’ Given To Pilots When
They Set Off On Missions.
Restoril is a ‘no-go pill’ to help them sleep.
The use of drugs by American pilots is an open
secret in the defence world. By Andrew
Buncombe AMERICAN PILOTS in Afghanistan,
blamed for a series of “friendly fire” incidents
and devastating erroneous attacks on innocent
civilians, were routinely provided with
amphetamines to tackle fatigue and help them fly
longer hours.
Pilots were allowed to “self-regulate” their own
doses and kept the drugs in their cockpits. The
pilots were provided with the stimulant
Dexedrine, generically known as
dextroamphetamine and referred to as a “go-pill”
by the airmen, when they set off on missions.
Countinue here.
Dwight David Eisenhower
Farewell Address
On the military-industrial complex and
the government-universities collusion
(17 January 1961)
Chicago's Parking Meter Revolt
Cannabis Cures Cancer -
"Run From The Cure"
The Rick Simpson Story
Rick Simpson Story After a serious head injury in
1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical
condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil.
When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its
high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and
other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many
people as he could free of charge. When the story
went public, the long arm of the law snatched the
medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people
without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick
with unconsitutional charges of possessing and
trafficking marijuana!
The Government Dark Side
About the Gorilla in the Livingroom
Should the World Bring Bush and
Cheney to Trial?

Vincent Bugliosi has expressed recent
exasperation over the issue of torture being
mentioned currently with greater frequency over
what the former L.A. County prosecutor believes to
be the key issue over which George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney should face trial -- murder.

Bugliosi's concern, through which he urges action
from an American prosecutorial body to bring Bush
and Cheney to trial, could be directly addressed
through the international tribunal of the
International Court of Justice at The Hague.
A reputable source of keeping up to date about the
number of Iraqi civilians killed since the initial
"shock and awe"- attacks on Baghdad ordered by
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld prior to
occupying that city and the nation of Iraq is Just
Foreign Policy. This informative site provides
international detailed analysis of significant events
throughout the world.
Just Foreign Policy publishes numbers based on
the highly respected international medical journal
The Lancet. According to The Lancet's detailed
continuing study, supportive evidence of which is
supplied by Just Foreign Policy, the current death
figure is much higher than that reported by
America's mainstream media on those rare
occasions when any such information is presented.

A current check of Just Foreign Policy reveals the
Iraqi civilian death toll following the U.S. invasion
to be 1,320,110. The continuing study of The Lancet
reveals that 600,000 Iraqi civilians had been killed
by July 2006 with the remainder of more than
double occurring
in the less than three years since then.

A major area of misunderstanding arising even
among progressives opposing the war has been
the labeling within the mainstream media and
elsewhere of the conflict as "pre-emptive war."-
Under the rules that governed the Nuremberg
Trials, the UN Charter, and other recognized
international bodies, pre-emptive war is
international legal terminology for legitimate
self-defense and is permissible.

The rule governing pre-emptive war is akin to the
famous First Amendment principle enunciated in
the Supreme Court by Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes of "clear and present danger."- Under the
pre-emptive war concept a nation faces
reasonable imminent threat from a foreign invader
and under those circumstances possesses a right
to attack based on a principle of self-defense.

Bush-Cheney propagandists have been successful
in being able to make the term pre-emptive war
stick when in reality the issue is that of preventive
war, which is clearly illegal under international law.

The brilliant two hour opening presentation by U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson at the main
Nuremberg Trial involving the leading figures of
Nazi Germany was centered on connecting German
Fuhrer Adolf Hitler with specific plans to attack
Poland and England. Jackson sought to link Hitler
and his regime with European aggression through
preventive war, that which is indefensible under
international law.

Recently there has been talk from certain UN
sources that if after that body's own investigation
concludes that U.S. leadership engaged in such
aggressive preventive war along with unjustifiable
torture tactics and the hunting down of victims
without recourse to the law, then arrests could be
made on U.S. soil.

On this rationale such arrests could be made
without the U.S. government being involved in any
way, obviating any necessity of action on the part
of congressional bodies or U.S. courts.

Should George W. Bush be so approached in a
specific effort to arrest him under international
law, it has been noted that he is accompanied by
armed U.S. Secret Service agents to protect him.

To use a term from a sport President Barack Obama
loves to play and watch, basketball, "The ball would
be in his court"- and the crucial and ultimately
decisive question of whether he would be willing
under those circumstances to order Bush's Secret
Service detail to "stand down"- in the interest of
international law.


Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los
Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer
at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in
sportswriting of high school events at the Los
Angeles Examiner. Received a bachelor's in
(more...)
Art;
News Article;
Italy got it right:
CIA renditions are wrong
The conviction of 23 Americans in the abduction of
Muslim cleric Abu Omar may be largely symbolic, but
it sends an important message to the Obama
administration.'
Extrajudicial detentions" and "extraordinary
renditions" were nicely scrubbed terms for the
Bush administration's policy of capturing suspects
in one country and spiriting them away to another,
where they were harshly interrogated and even
tortured. Now an Italian court has called this CIA
practice by its real name -- illegal.

The conviction of 23 Americans and two Italians for
kidnapping an Egyptian cleric off the streets of
Milan in 2003 in one sense is largely symbolic: The
defendants were tried in absentia, and the Italian
government is not seeking their extradition; barring
a successful appeal, the two governments may try
to work out a clemency deal. Yet the decision
matters. It repudiates President Obama's expressed
desire to look away from the ugly past, and sends a
strong message that the U.S. government cannot
operate outside the law with impunity in the name of
fighting terrorism.

The CIA abducted Hassan Osama Nasr on Feb. 17,
2003. The Muslim cleric, suspected of recruiting
insurgents for Iraq and Afghanistan, was flown to
Egypt, where he allegedly was tortured with electric
shocks, beatings and threats of rape. He was
released in 2007.

Obama has since ended CIA interrogations in secret
prisons and shut overseas jails used by the CIA, but
he has not stopped the practice of extraordinary
rendition. The difference between his and his
predecessor's policy is that the administration will
now demand credible assurances that prisoners
won't be tortured, and that prisoners will be
"rendered to justice" rather than held indefinitely
without trial.

We don't like renditions and generally think even
the most dangerous criminals are entitled to due
process, including extradition hearings. A war
against violent extremists cannot be won by
immoral or illegal means; the U.S. can't outsource
dirty work and claim to have clean hands.

Some have questioned how this case differs from
the capture of Nazi Germany's Adolf Eichmann by
Israeli security forces in Buenos Aires in May 1960,
an extrajudicial action that was widely praised at the
time. One significant difference is that Argentina's
military government was harboring a war criminal,
whereas Italy had opened its own criminal
investigation of Nasr when the CIA swooped in to
kidnap him. Another is that Eichmann was put on
trial, publicly. Nasr, to say the least, was not.
Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times
More About Money;
Solution to Financial Woes -- End
Debt-Based Dollars

A conference in Chicago looked at ways to solve
the current financial crisis constitutionally by
taking over the Fed and ending debt-based dollars.

By Mark Anderson

CHICAGO, Illinois—The American Monetary
Institute’s (AMI) annual conference here at
Roosevelt University happened just as the federal
government was wrapping up its nearly trillion-
dollar plan to further indebt the American people
by buying the worthless assets of certain Wall
Street interests at public expense. This and other
financial skullduggery have even the most
politically casual Americans trembling, while
wondering if this is finally “the perfect storm” that
will capsize our “ship of state.”

American Free Press covered the Sept. 27 session
of AMI’s Sept. 25-28 event. Moderated by noted
author and AMI President Stephen Zarlenga, the
session had an academic flavor, but its bold
exploration of the history of debt forgiveness, the
nature of money, who ought to issue it and other
topics—including observations on the so-called
“bailout”—painted a picture that stands in stark
contrast to the one presented to distraught
Americans by the big government-big media
alliance.

Absent from media pronouncements are any facts
or recommendations that might focus public
attention on the root causes of what may turn out
to be the nation’s worst-ever financial crisis—
much less any real, lasting solutions. But AMI is
among several sources covered by AFP that seek
real understanding of the seemingly complex issue
of money.

Entire schools of thought, especially in the
economic realm, are censored in this “free” nation,
but, as AFP has learned covering the AMI event
and several other programs, “the cure” is within
every citizen’s grasp, just waiting to he heard and
acted upon. The individuals and organizations that
attended the AMI conference communicated a
viewpoint that has some tricky variables and
points of debate, but it centers on sound
principles and ideas that could lead to a profound
economic revival.

Notably, this is not a Ron-Paul-style call for a return
to “sound money” in the form of a gold standard;
that view, whose backers support abolishing the
Federal Reserve System, has many merits and is
widely discussed. But here, we’re talking about a
somewhat different vision in which the Fed is
stripped of its unchallenged privilege of issuing
the nation’s currency and setting interest rates
without genuine public oversight (and without
audits). Indeed, the private central bank that has
commandeered the United States since 1913 would
be nationalized and kept only for basic operations,
due to its knowledge base.

Whether to nationalize or abolish the Fed, of
course, is a question that needs to be carefully
considered.

Imagine the U.S. Treasury issuing its own money,
instead of what we have now, where the Treasury
prints it at the Fed’s behest (for only pennies per
note, regardless of the denomination) and hands it
over to the banking fraternity so the bankers can
loan it back to the U.S. government at interest (in
the process, the Fed gets government bonds that
pledge the labor of all Americans behind the debt).

Cutting the Fed out of the creation and issuance of
money, which is AMI’s favored scenario, means
money would be spent into circulation interest-
free as a sovereign function of government,
according to the U.S. Constitution’s provision that
Congress is responsible for the money function.
Gold standard or not, reformers agree that printing
interest-free money is the reform that central
bankers dread.

Focusing on aspects of the “social credit theory,”
which is neither socialism nor monopoly capitalism,
AMI speaker Nicolaus Tideman, an economics
professor from Virginia Polytechnic Institute,
noted: “I think we need to regard society as a
money-issuing collective, in which we all have
equal shares.”

He added that, since this intriguing theory—
explained in detail as a workable plan in a book
obtained at the conference by AFP—calls for
paying a regular equal “dividend” to all citizens
simply by virtue of their citizenship, one option
would be to have the government announce
$10,000 loans to all citizens to be paid back in five
years. The people receiving the money could retire
numerous personal debts. Depositing the money in
local banks would address community needs.

But the kind of dividend called for in the
groundbreaking book In This Age of Plenty: A New
Conception of Economics—Social Credit, takes the
form of regular payouts, not loans, to every
member of the citizenry, all of whom are treated
like members of an economic cooperative, wherein
private enterprise and innovation are fully
encouraged and everyone, even the unemployed,
would receive non-debt, U.S. national money (not
Federal Reserve debt notes) as members of a
common enterprise blessed with the natural
resources provided by God.

Because working and contributing to the nation’s
productivity would mean higher dividends for all,
the incentive is to work, not to loaf. This is the
worldview in this book, published by the Pilgrims
of St. Michael (a.k.a The White Berets), based in
Canada.

The extreme usury that Jesus of Nazareth rightfully
condemned when he drove out the
moneychangers is strangling the people, as
several AMI speakers noted. Commentator David I.
Kelley and Mr. Zarlenga concurred that usury is not
just high interest rates; it’s actually “taking unfair
advantage of the financially weaker.”

Kelley, referring to current events, condemned the
gross misuse of the nation’s financial mechanisms
and the havoc being wrought. He said usury is an
“anti-social use of money” where “the borrower is
a slave to the lender and the debtor to the
creditor.” He said real capitalism means fashioning
raw materials into goods sold for profit. But, he
said, “We have replaced the primacy of labor over
land and capital”—where labor is the most
important element—with the idea that “money
becomes a god in and of itself.”

He lamented that America is “always placing labor
behind capital,” and American businesses aren’t
even allowed to operate without massive capital
behind them. Kelley went on to note what was later
expounded on by Dr. Michael Hudson—that for
centuries debts at all levels were forgiven on a
cyclical basis and the slate was wiped clean so
society could rebuild, free of turmoil and strife.
However, under the current monetary matrix,
significant debt forgiveness is virtually unheard of
in a world where nearly everyone is an economic
serf.

Hudson noted how the famed classical Greek
leader, Solon, literally rescued his nation by
abolishing personal slavery as debt security.
Farmers who had been banished from their own
land were returned to their farms as all debt
contracts were cancelled and seized land was
returned to rightful owners. Hudson added that,
for centuries, those who financed transoceanic
voyages and land caravans were only paid back if
the ventures were successful, as long as fraud
was absent.

“If the shipper lost, he did not have to pay the
creditor,” Hudson said. “Interest was paid as a
portion of the surplus to the public sector if
everything (in the venture) goes as it’s supposed
to.” He added that, The Lost Tradition of Biblical
Debt Cancellation is the name of a book whose self-
explanatory title points to a practice that favored
borrowers over lenders. The practice goes back to
Babylonian times. Referring to the “barley debts”
of Sumeria, he said: “In the Near East for
thousands of years the first act of new rulers was
to cancel consumer debts”—especially those owed
by the poor.

Fast forward to today. Hudson noted that, in the
current “bailout,” we see “just exactly the opposite
of ancient times,” in that the U.S. government
advocates a plan to further indebt the average
person to the monied class. This means only
canceling or absorbing the debts of the rich, even
though the Democrats claim to have the interests
of poorer homeowners in mind, Hudson noted,
adding that the current ruling class is ruthless.

Hudson concluded that there are laws on the
books in New York state which, applied nationally,
would nullify debts when loans were made beyond
the debtor’s ability to pay.

Today, he said, America is “favoring the creditors
instead of debtors,” overturning centuries of
doing things the other way around.
clocksforweb para tus Pisos!
Rink A Dink Productions
Low Budget Movies
Here are 4 Videos by
Ronnini LoBello,
Ronnini is known for his use
of music blended with the
action and interesting
transitions. Giving the
viewer a bit of a trippie
feeling except for Sara and
Sam's Wedding, this was
edited to provoke both
laughter and crying.
All 3 videos are worth
watching. Just click onto the
thumbnail       
Article;
Cocaine, the 6th food group











Confusing South American farmland and rain forest
for cocaine plants, and then recklessly destroying
them. Sounds like a project with the U.S. federal
government’s name all over it. In fact, it is, in the
form of taxpayer-funded airplanes that are
dropping the taxpayer-funded pesticides.

In 2000, President Clinton signed a bill funding
Plan Colombia, a State Department initiative to
reduce coca growth in the South American country,
mostly by spraying the plants with pesticide. And in
its 2008 federal budget bill, the Bush
administration is seeking an identical amount of
funding for it as last year. The plan could be called
a great, huge, amazing success — yes, if its goals
included increasing coca plant growth, increasing
cocaine imports into the U.S., and lowering cocaine
prices for the U.S. consumer.

Problem one: No discrimination. In Putumayo, one
of the most coca-dense areas in Colombia, 40% of
the crops sprayed since 2000 have been rain
forests (even indiscriminate destruction doesn’t
come cheap: $4,975 tax dollars per acre) or crops
that are the villagers’ main source of food. Oops.

Problem two: Legal plants are a money-loser,
making coca the most profitable plant around.
There’s no infrastructure to get legal plants to
market, leaving peasants with no other choice than
coca. Drug cartels just have a better work ethic
about moving products.

Problem three: “Also funded by cocaine and
considered terrorists by the State Department,
paramilitary forces [allies with Colombia President
Uribe and, by extension, the United States] have
fast become some of the country’s largest drug
traffickers. In other words, U.S. taxpayer money
meant to fight the drug trade is funding allies who
are, in part, fueling it.” That one speaks for itself.

Problem four (my personal favorite): Funding coca
production is an effective “screw you” gesture to
America. Venezuelan President (dictator?) Hugo
Chavez has pledged $1 million to build coca food-
processing plants in Bolivia. The Peruvian
government resists U.S. business pressure by
producing coca cookies, energy bars, and other
products.

The only good news? Since 2000, the price of
cocaine has dropped by 29 percent on U.S. streets
while purity has risen from 60 percent to 70
percent.
/www.northbynorthwestern.com/
There is a revolution happening in the farm
fields and on the dinner tables of America that
is transforming the very nature of the food we
eat.  This well-researched documentary by
Deborah Koons Garcia, the widow of the
legendary Grateful Dead guitarist Jerry Garcia,
takes an in-depth look at the disturbing truth
behind the unlabeled, patented, genetically
engineered foods that have quietly filled U.S.
grocery store shelves for the past decades.
This film examines the complex web of market
and political forces that are changing what we
eat as huge, multinational corporations seek to
control the world’s food systems but also
explores alternatives to large-scale industrial
agriculture, offering solutions like organic and
sustainable agriculture as alternative food
sources.
UC San Diego Psychiatrist Says
Yes to Pot

Though medical marijuana may be taken via an oral
prescription called Marinol, a UC San Diego
psychiatrist named Igor Grant is lighting a fire
under the *ss of legislators. A researcher for the
UC Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research in San
Diego (yes, it does exist), Dr. Grant supports
smoking marijuana, as opposed to just taking
Marinol, for decreasing pain associated with nerve
damage, to help abate nausea from chemotherapy
and antiretroviral therapy, and to increase appetite
for patients suffering from AIDS wasting syndrome.

According to a statement Dr. Grant made to the Los
Angeles Times, “Smoking is a very efficient way to
deliver THC.”

Stoners have known this for years, but three
recent studies have all concluded that smoking
weed can mollify pain suffered in association with
neuropathic pain in a way similar to other
analgesics. Another study showed that amongst 51
multiple sclerosis patients, intensity of spasms was
decreased by 32% after smoking up, and pain was
reduced by 50%.

So why deal with marijuana if there are other
comparable analgesic treatments? Grant believes
that because patients do not always respond to
certain analgesics, it is vital to permit different
treatment options. A spokesman for the White
House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Tom
Riley, disagrees fervently and said that those
seeking the legalization of smoking medical
marijuana “want to be exempted from the regular
approval process.”

Dr. Grant was awarded the top national award from
the National Academy of Neuropsychology, the
Lifetime Achievement Award, in 2007. Potheads
hoping for the slippery slope effect think he’s
pretty dope too.
About the Type-os you might
find in the
Rink A Dink Productions,  
Infozine

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at
Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it
deosn't mttaer in waht oredr
the letters in a word are, the
only iprmoatnt thing is that
the frist and lsat ltteer be at
the rghit pclae. The rset can
be a toatl mses and you can
sitll raed it wouthit a
porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the
huamn mnid deos not raed
ervey lteter by istlef, but the
wrod as a wlohe.

But if it still bothers you
please drop me a line.
editor@rinkadinkproductions.com
Obama and the global elite
This documentary exposes the truth behind Obama
and the story of the people who control him and
every other president we have had in the past 100
years. You will see that Obama, like Bush before
him is a walking contradiction that is used to push
the Council on Foreign Relations agenda that is
nothing less than a global goverment. Do your own
research, factcheck this documentary, and please
download this before internet 2 is in place.
R Crumb
    Robert Dennis Crumb (born
    August 30, 1943), often credited
    simply as R. Crumb,isan American
    artist and illustrator recognized
    for the distinctive style of his
    drawings and his critical,
satirical, subversive view of the American
mainstream. He currently lives in Southern France
with his wife Aline Kominsky-Crumb.
Crumb was a founder of the underground comix
movement and is regarded as its most prominent
figure. Though one of the most celebrated of comic
book artists, Crumb's entire career has unfolded
outside the mainstream comic book publishing
industry. One of his most recognized works is the
"Keep on Truckin'" comic, which became a widely
distributed fixture of pop culture in the 1970s.
Others are the characters Devil Girl, Fritz the Cat,
and Mr. Natural. He also illustrates album covers,
including Cheap Thrills by Big Brother and the
Holding Company and the compilation album The
Music Never Stopped: Roots of the Grateful Dead.
R Crumb Gallery
The Politics of Pollution
Cap-and-Trade: All Cost, No Benefit
By Martin Feldstein
The Obama administration and congressional
Democrats have proposed a major cap-and-trade
system aimed at reducing carbon dioxide
emissions. Scientists agree that CO2 emissions
around the world could lead to rising temperatures
with serious long-term environmental
consequences. But that is not a reason to enact a
U.S. cap-and-trade system until there is a global
agreement on CO2 reduction. The proposed
legislation would have a trivially small effect on
global warming while imposing substantial costs on
all American households. And to get political
support in key states, the legislation would
abandon the auctioning of permits in favor of
giving permits to selected corporations.

Companies would buy permits from each other as
long as it is cheaper to do that than to make the
technological changes needed to eliminate an
equivalent amount of CO2 emissions. Companies
would also pass along the cost of the permits in
their prices, pushing up the relative price of
CO2-intensive goods and services such as
gasoline, electricity and a range of industrial
products. Consumers would respond by cutting
back on consumption of CO2-intensive products in
favor of other goods and services. This
pass-through of the permit cost in higher
consumer prices is the primary way the
cap-and-trade system would reduce the production
of CO2 in the United States.
The Congressional Budget Office recently
estimated that the resulting increases in consumer
prices needed to achieve a 15 percent CO2
reduction -- slightly less than the Waxman-Markey
target -- would raise the cost of living of a typical
household by $1,600 a year. Some expert studies
estimate that the cost to households could be
substantially higher. The future cost to the typical
household would rise significantly as the
government reduces the total allowable amount of
CO2.

Americans should ask themselves whether this
annual tax of $1,600-plus per family is justified by
the very small resulting decline in global CO2.
Since the U.S. share of global CO2 production is
now less than 25 percent (and is projected to
decline as China and other developing nations
grow), a 15 percent fall in U.S. CO2 output would
lower global CO2 output by less than 4 percent. Its
impact on global warming would be virtually
unnoticeable. The U.S. should wait until there is a
global agreement on CO2 that includes China and
India before committing to costly reductions in the
United States.

The CBO estimates that the sale of the permits for a
15 percent CO2 reduction would raise revenue of
about $80 billion a year over the next decade. It is
remarkable, then, that the Waxman-Markey bill
would give away some 85 percent of the permits
over the next 20 years to various businesses
instead of selling them at auction. The price of the
permits and the burden to households would be
the same whether the permits are sold or given
away. But by giving them away the government
would not collect the revenue that could, at least in
principle, be used to offset some of the higher cost
to households.

The Waxman-Markey bill would give away 30
percent of the permits to local electricity
distribution companies with the expectation that
their regulators would require those firms to pass
the benefit on to their customers. If they do this by
not raising prices, there would be less CO2
reduction through lower electricity consumption.
The permit price would then have to be higher to
achieve more CO2 reduction on all other products.
Some electricity consumers would benefit, but the
cost to all other American families would be higher.

In my judgment, the proposed cap-and-trade
system would be a costly policy that would penalize
Americans with little effect on global warming. The
proposal to give away most of the permits only
makes a bad idea worse. Taxpayers and legislators
should keep these things in mind before enacting
any cap-and-trade system.

Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at
Harvard University and president emeritus of the
nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research,
was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers
from 1982 to 1984.
A Call For Alternative Energy
Coal burning must end,
says scientist
ANDREW DARBY IN HOBART
April 24, 2009

A CSIRO scientist has told a Senate inquiry it is
imperative to begin phasing out coal burning in
order to avoid dangerous climate change.

No coal-fired power plants should be built, and
existing plants must shut within 20 years, if the
world is to keep atmospheric carbon dioxide at a
less dangerous level, the climatologist James
Risbey said.

Yesterday Dr Risbey joined other CSIRO scientists
who have spoken out personally to the Senate
committee on climate policy's inquiry after the
CSIRO decided against making a submission.

He said the Rudd Government's targets of reducing
carbon dioxide levels by at least 5 per cent of 2000
levels by 2020 and 60 per cent by 2050 were not
tough enough to avoid dangerous climate change.

"In fact, they yield a high likelihood of triggering
irreversible changes in the climate system," he
said at the committee's hearings in Hobart. "Such
likelihoods can be greatly reduced with far more
stringent emissions reductions. However, further
delay makes safer concentration targets
unattainable and begins to lock in dangerous
climate change."

The committee was told that at current levels of
greenhouse gas growth, the world risked an
irreversible collapse in the Greenland and West
Antarctic ice sheets, contributing roughly seven
and five metres each to global sea level rise.

Acidification of the oceans, release of stored
methane and breakdown of snowmelt would also
affect food webs and the global population.

"While we cannot give a precise temperature at
which each of these processes would occur, the
threshold is thought to be in the vicinity of about
two degrees in each case," Dr Risbey said.

But Australia's proposed Carbon Pollution
Reduction Scheme, if applied by all countries,
would mean a 50 to 90 per cent chance of
exceeding the threshold.

"In other words, this is Russian roulette with the
climate system, with most of the chambers loaded,"
he said.
Pollution in China









How bad is the pollution in China?
James Fallows reports.
The Chinese government does not report, and may
not even measure, what other countries consider
the most dangerous form of air pollution: PM2.5, the
smallest particulate matter, tiny enough to work its
way deep into the alveoli. Instead, Chinese reports
cover only the grosser PM10 particulates, which are
less dangerous but more unsightly, because they
make the air dark and turn your handkerchief black
if you blow your nose. (Spitting on the street:
routine in China. Blowing your nose into a
handkerchief: something no cultured person would
do.) These unauthorized PM2.5 readings, sent out
on a Twitter stream (BeijingAir), show the pollution
in Beijing routinely to be in the "Very Unhealthy" or
"Hazardous" range, not seen in U.S. cities in
decades. I've heard from friends about persistent
coughs and blood tests that show traces of heavy
metals. "I encourage people with children not to
consider extended tours in China," a
Western-trained doctor said. "Those little lungs."
See Photo Journal click here.
Stephen Voss has a set of Chinese pollution photos
along with an accompanying story.
Things the Government Dose Not
Want to Talk About;
The War on Pollution
or Pollution from War
Retired professor and prolific author Barry Sanders
has spent a long time looking closely at the US
Military where others hadn’t: he looked at the
environmental effects and the sheer devastation
that the military leaves in its wake. He compiled a
frightening collection of numbers into his book The
Green Zone. I contacted him through the book’s
publisher, AK Press, and sent him a letter, asking
about the findings, about how we activists are so
used to looking at our corporate foes and overlook
the military, and about what we as Earth First!ers
could hope to do about it. Here is his response:
I do not separate the corporate agenda from the
military agenda in this country. I do not mean simply
the old Eisenhower conflation, which he daintily
called the military-industrial complex. He makes
such an alliance sound like a kind of neat and tidy
collusion. It is a straight up partnership now: each
one needs the other. Almost all big corporations
are in the war business, or at the very least, in the
military business. Think of auto manufacturing and
how many specialized small shops went out of
business with the collapse of the auto industry. To
raise a tank takes a small corporate village. Cut
back on the Pentagon budget and you slice and
dice the economy—that’s one grand reason, at
least, no politician is willing to take on the military.
There are other reasons, but that’s a big one.
Having said that, I am reminded of a line by the
Indian writer Arundhati Roy, in her book War Talk:
she says “... the state acts in the name of its
citizens. So, as a citizen, I am forced to
acknowledge that I am somehow made complicit in
the Gujarat pogrom.” It is not just large
corporations that are complicit in this business of
making war and polluting the world. I am complicit,
too—we all are. Even though I do not wear a
uniform, I am an essential part of the military: I pay
my taxes, I am allowed to periodically protest some
given war, and thus indirectly and against my will I
support the war. For me, what I understood after
working on this book is that the fate of the Earth
rests in the hands of the military. That is one of the
most frightening and appalling notions anyone can
confront. The United States military engages in a
War of Terroir: it is destroying everything. For me,
this is an issue of enormous magnitude, which all of
us must confront.
How badly does the military pollute? I think as
citizens we have no idea how bad the pollution
actually is. At any rate, the carbon dioxide and
sulfur dioxide would translate into numbers and
lose its edge, just the way the dead Iraqis and
Afghanis and GIs come to us as glorified body
counts. The task of computing takes us afield and
keeps us distracted. I have come up with
approximate numbers in The Green Zone, but who
the hell really knows? I say no one. What if we knew
the number? Would we be any closer to stopping
the war machine?
People want numbers. I understand that. But more
importantly, we need action. Here’s an example of
how much we do not know: this very morning
(Monday, July 27, 2009) I opened the New York
Times and read a piece (on page 15) about the
military conscription of indigenous peoples—in this
case Navajos—during the ‘50s to work in hundreds
of military mines in the heart of the Navajo Nation
digging up uranium for the military to use in its
weapons. (The military used depleted uranium in
Iraq in many of its warheads.) Over the years, as the
New York Times points out, “Navajo miners
extracted some 4 million tons of uranium ore from
the ground, much of it used by the United States
government to make weapons.” And now those
same indigenous people, and their grown children,
are falling sick from radiation poisoning. Their
houses and drinking water and crops are all
contaminated. I count this tragedy, thousands of
miles removed from the Middle East, scores of
years removed from any Pentagon action, as military
pollution.
The last part of The Green Zone takes up the topic
of fallout through the military’s use of depleted
uranium in certain of its warheads in the war in Iraq.
How can I tally or categorize such extraordinary
pollution that produces radioactive waste with a
half life of 4.5 billion years and that results in
disfigured fetuses and corrupts food supplies and
kills animals and fish populations and on and on?
Can we equate the horror of such lethality with the
emission of greenhouse gases? Such a
grotesquerie almost makes carbon and sulfite
pollution seem tame. This kind of pollution does not
of course stay in place but gets blown around the
globe on wind currents.
That’s why when I talk about military pollution I want
to write the word with a capital P, because it is so
much more lethal than any other kind of pollution
we have encountered as environmentalists. While
the military is the largest single consumer of oil in
the world, that can be a misleading statement since
America has a population of 330 million people, a
great majority of whom drive cars. And who knows
the actual count of factories in this country that
continually pump carbons into the atmosphere. But,
as I try to point out, the military not only pollutes, it
contaminates, it transfigures, it eliminates. And this
is why I say it makes no difference how green we
get in our homes and offices because the military
negates our every effort at cutting greenhouse
emissions.
Several military critics make the point that
bureaucrats in the Pentagon may not even know
the exact numbers for military consumption of oil
and gas. While we do know that it is the single
largest consumer of oil in the world, the Pentagon
is just too huge and complex and cumbersome for
any citizen to find a number that we can know with
certainty. Couple that with the fact that the military
hides a good deal of its statistics for fuel
consumption, for purchases, for types and kinds of
weapons. After months and months of digging into
web sites and leaked documents, I do not know the
precise figures for the military; I have not come
across anyone who does know, or says he or she
knows. I spent an enormous time trying to ferret out
those numbers—almost everything significant
about weapons and vehicles and fuel consumption
the Pentagon keeps classified or hidden. In the
book, I list those numbers that the military likes to
boast about, like the Abrams Tank consuming five
gallons of fuel to cover a single mile. During battle,
over ideal terrain, the Abrams can gobble up 252
gallons of fuel each and every hour. With its
afterburners kicked in, the F-15 uses fuel at the
astonishing rate of four gallons per second, or
14,400 gallons an hour!
What can we do as environmentalists? As an initial
suggestion—and I do not want anyone to think I
have the answers—for stopping the olive-drab
juggernaut is an overwhelming prospect, but one
thing I would like to suggest is that the movement
must redefine itself, must expand its range of
concerns to include putting an end to war. If you
consider yourself green, you must become olive
green and include an opposition to the military. The
International Panel on Climate Change has an
agenda that runs to some 20 pages, but it has never
included one mention of the war. Whenever the
Bioneers meet to discuss climate change, they
never mention the military. As far as I am
concerned, this is a gross omission.
What to do? For one very apparent thing, an
environmental movement that does not include an
opposition to all war—not an anti-war stance about
Iraq or Afghanistan, but an absolute, no-war
stance—is a movement defined too narrowly. In the
early years of the Vietnam War, teach-ins enabled
people to learn the truth about, say, the Gulf of
Tonkin. We ought to be doing the same thing
today—educating people about the military’s power
to end life on the planet. We need to talk to people
about their fears of losing their lives to acts of
terror. That fear is misplaced. The military is not
protecting us—it is creating more insurgents, more
enemies of this country. This is fairly clear to many
radicals, but not to the public in general.
The planet, the globe, is at stake—the Earth cannot
withstand war any more. If we cannot stop such
gross nonsense, the Earth will stop it for us—plain
and simple. I can imagine a March of Life on
Washington the likes of which history has not
witnessed—a huge coalition of people who say no
to war, to pollution, to homophobia, to sexism and
racism, to oppression of all kinds. Most of the wars
this country has engaged in have been against
people of color, including of course our current
ones. Imperialism is opposed to everything that
Earth First! holds sacred.
We must finally see that all these concerns and
issues are related. Hate of any kind, discrimination
and intolerance of any kind, we must count as social
pollution. The issue is not putting an end to the war
in Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan, or putting a stop
to the so-called war on terror. It is a moment of
coming to consciousness, of building a new and
different and more enlightened and liberating
attitude toward the Earth—toward plants and
animals and people, toward all living things. The old
world, the old, dead world, is built on hate and
destruction. It’s time, as they say, to move on—in
the largest, most inclusive, most communitarian
ways imaginable. Only a communitarian spirit, in my
estimation, will save us.
Cool Idea;
The Pedal-A-Watt Stationary
Bicycle Generator
    Today’s twin goals of
    keeping fit while doing
    something good for
    the planet by creating
    electricity without any
    pollution
come together in a product that has been around
for over ten years – The Pedal-A-Watt Stationary
Bicycle Generator. Use your bicycle along with the
Pedal-A-Watt Stand (it takes 15 seconds to drop
your bike in) and create anywhere from 100 to 300
watts depending on how strong you are.
Then, use this energy to power small, household
appliances. For example, a home office with a
laptop and high efficiency LED lighting can be run
for almost three hours on just a 30 minute workout.

The kids can “earn” their TV time by pedaling to
create the energy needed to watch their favorite
shows. Plus, kids will learn the true meaning of a
“watt” and how many watts it takes to power their
favorite electronic devices. It gives them a
newfound appreciation for the cost of energy in
physical terms.

And, the user will be helping to stay fit too. The
typical adult will burn somewhere between 300 and
700 calories for each 30 minute workout. A few
times a week and the calories expended really add
up. Plus, the amount of energy created over time is
surprising.

People all over the world have used the Pedal-A-
Watt to power all kinds of items such a projectors,
radios, lights in remote villages, water pumps,
small heaters, chicken coops and hundreds of
other unique applications.

The Pedal-A-Watt has been donated to schools
across the country to help grade school children
learn about alternative energy. Watch Video
Free Energy?
Will 2010 be the Year of Zero Point
Energy?
14 Jan 2010
Posted by froarty

For decades researchers have reported anomalous
excess heat when atomic hydrogen and catalysts
are involved. The mechanisms and therefore the
ability to scale the effect have eluded scientists.
Researchers point to chemical and nuclear
byproducts but both of which are insufficient to
explain the amount of heat detected. This article
proposes a solution without byproducts pitting
natures desire for the diatomic state against a
"focused" catalytic force that disassociates these
molecules back to their atomic state.( see this
animation ).In May 2008 Arata-Yang demonstrated
the effect repeatedly using Pd and deuterium. Their
experiment was recently replicated by Kitamura et
all Phys. Lett. A, 2009. 273(35): p. 3109-3112.

In the United States we have a patent granted in
May 2008 to Haisch and Moddel for a system based
on Casimir cavities and 2 Rowan university
validations of the Black Light Process developed
by Randell Mills, one in 2008 using reactors and
materials supplied by Mills and more the second in
August of 2009 a validation using only recipes from
Mills while materials were procured commercially.
All of these researchers appear to have different
theories some of which are in direct conflict with
established physics, hence Mills inability to patent
a process that is clearly demonstrating excess heat
while Haisch and Moddel were able to patent an as
yet un-prototyped device using virtually the same
physical concept but based on different physics.
While the skeletal catalyst Rayney Nickel forms
activated pores with geometry making them Casimir
cavities the math and chemistry Mills submits to
define the reaction is based on catalytic action and
requires hydrogen to take on orbital states 2 to 137
times smaller than ground state. Haisch and
Moddel rephrase the "hydrino" which violates the
laws of physics to what they term a system for
converting energy from electromagnetic quantum
vacuum by suppressing appropriate frequencies by
virtue of the Casimir effect which suppresses
longer wavelength vacuum energy as the plates
get closer. Mills definition could have been
salvaged in 2005 when Jan Naudts proposed the
137 fractional states could be relativistic or even
later when in 2007 Ron Bourgoin published a paper
that actually proved the 137 fractional states using
equations dictating a relativistic environment for
electrons(occupying the same spatial position).
Mills embraced the support but never redefined
his theory or patent application allowing Haisch and
Moddel to patent their similar theory unopposed.

The Theories still do not explain how the
conservation of energy is broken, even if the
hydrogen or deuterium translates to relativistic
hydrogen inside a Casimir cavity the transition as
noted by Mills is nonradiative, according to Mills a
reaction is necessary inside the cavity but
according to the H-M theory the hydrogen loses
energy to the cavity walls but is then restored via
the global vacuum energy as it exits the cavity. My
point is that any energy differential will cause a
back pressure to the hydrogen supply restricting
the flow into the cavity equal to any potential
energy gains. I am proposing that nature provides
two opposing forces inside a Casimir cavity that
can be manipulated into oscillating to produce
heat. Nature's desire for the diatomic state is
opposed by dihydrinos caught in a changing
Casimir depletion field. The ability of relativistic
hydrogen to translate without photon emission tells
us the atom is reshaped from our perspective by
the lower vacuum energy inside the cavity. This
reshaping can have 137 different values according
to Bourgoin's paper forming a gradient based on
the very local plate geometry and spacing. These
atoms still try to reshape even after forming a
molecule but find their efforts opposed by the new
covalent bond, the covalent bond gets broken by
this reshaping force when the molecule moves to a
spatial position where the Casimir force changes
sufficiently that the reshaping force disassociates
the molecule restoring monatomic energy levels.
This reshaping force is based on normally chaotic
vacuum fluctuations that normally sum to zero. It
appears that multiple inertial frames allow a
normally chaotic field to be organized and
exploited. The balancing point however is difficult
to maintain because nature immediately forces the
atoms back to diatomic states which emits a photon
and starts the cycle over again in what can become
a destructive thermal runaway quickly melting the
cavity to relieve the Casimir force and producing
the hydride byproducts claimed by Black Light
Power or going the other way, starving the process
into the slow "life after death" scenario described
by Arata and others where a slow excess heat is
recorded after the experiment is de-energized and
lasting days to weeks depending on the size and
geometry of nano powders and loading methods. In
the animation note hydrogen on top with normal
(red) emission on bonding while moving plates
show relativistic atoms translated and spectrum
shifted (blue). At bottom an exaggerated multiple
vacuum fluctuation is shown twisting with time
dilation to appear faster from our perspective vs
being displaced by shorter fluctuations per current
theory.

The reason I lump LENR, sono fusion and other
methods to Mills is because I don't feel the skeletal
catalyst used by Mill's is just coincidentally
composed of Casimir cavities like the Haisch
Moddel patent proposes, other catalysts such as
Pd and Pd nanopowders (Arata),tungsten cathodes
or cathodes formed through dual deposition like
the LENR experiments of SPAWAR are also noted
for their high surface area indicative of Casimir
geometry. It is unlikely these different reports all
involving monatomic gas and catalysts are
unrelated. even sonoluminescence may be the
result of conductive Casimir cavities formed of
collapsing menisci with trapped hydrogen
transitioning between hydrino and dihydrino states
in the same method shown in my animation http:
//www.byzipp.com/finished1.swf -and the
sonoluminescence produces a similar plasma to
the BLP device.

Another reason I am tolerant of the hydride
byproducts and lack of dihydrinos available for
analysis is the very short duration of the BLP
reaction. It screams thermal runaway and the
byproducts would only account for the destructive
reactions necessary to relieve the Casimir force by
melting closed or shorting the parallel plates. In my
theory there is no byproduct -nature oscillates
between the desired diatomic state and molecular
disassociation when the new high mobility
molecule finds its covalent bond opposed by the
individual atoms still trying to transition to different
fractional states(relativistic). What is needed is a
control loop to keep the frequency slow enough to
extract the heat before damage can occur.

The fact that other reports of excess heat do not
produce these hydrides and can evolve over days
or weeks suggests the opposite condition of
starvation where oscillation is delayed and slow but
still occurs over time as the atomic gas slowly
accumulates the velocities needed to exchange
time dilation for energy. Kitamura's replication of
Arata experiment indicates the effect becomes
more prominent with fineness of the nanopowders.

The application of Naudts relativistic proposal to
the Casimir effect is often met with skepticism, At
the macro scale time dilation requires velocities at
high fractions of C or crushing gravitational wells
that provide equivalent acceleration of similar
effect. These effects are concentrating our
interaction with virtual particles. We know linear
luminal velocity would be impossible to attain in a
Casimir cavity so I have assumed equivalent
deceleration vs equivalent acceleration.

From the Puthoff atomic model I conjecture an
energy "pressure" that keeps orbitals in a balanced
ground state –hence “my river of time”/virtual
particles pressing past our nuclei and growing
larger as they flash past our electrons in the final
scene of my animation. I want to springboard from
this concept to an XY axis of velocity vs time where
as v approaches C an animated spacecraft slows it’
s progress along the x axis and starts to rise and
contract on the y axis – all with the virtual particle
background from above animation playing at 20%
alpha illumination to make the point the ships
velocity relative to the moving field has a
Pythagorean component that becomes more
pronounced as matter starts to reach velocities of
similar magnitude to the virtual particles. I hesitate
to say these virtual particles have a luminal velocity
since their "rate" may well establish the relativistic
values upon which we measure "time". that said
these virtual particles still must obey certain rules
and not occupy already existing space causing a
“pressure” differential that agrees with Puthoff’s
atomic model, I believe this "pressure" causes a
vortex around and behind the nucleus (from a 4D
perspective) that restores the orbital energy after
spontaneous emission and keeps a balanced
ground state. This “standard” pressure of time
passing from future to past through matter is what I
believe Casimir cavities are able to “segregate”. It
is not just like a tiny cavity of dead air like you
imagine with insulation materials. I believe the
plate geometry of conductors concentrate a
resistance to this flow like the canvas sails of a
sailing ship where a small hole (cavity) creates a
relief where the concentrated wind pressure forms
a venturi where the speed and pressure is far
removed from the nominal wind speed. It is this
difference between the nominal value of time and
the venturi induced values inside the cavity that
we can exploit with atomic hydrogen.

In the same paradox manner that accelerating
matter in 3D space slows time from our perspective
the increased pressure of virtual particles
accelerates time from our perspective and
decelerates spatial velocity inside the cavity. The
absolute difference between
our inertial frame and these decelerated frames
inside the cavity is often referred to as negative
energy regarding Casimir cavities. It suggests a
gravity hill as opposed to a deep gravity well in the
twin paradox where the space faring twin can park
on a high G object to accumulate time dilation,
instead the shielded (decelerated) cavity equates
to the earthbound twin and hydrogen outside the
cavity equates to the "high G" twin. One should not
focus on the difference between planetary gravity
vs free space which would NOT account for the
effect -rather we should consider the "nominal
rate" at which virtual particles pass through 3D
space which is amplified by this "venturi like"
property of a Casimir cavity. The pressure is
described by the Casimir formula and is inversely
proportional to the cube of the distance between
plate geometries inside the cavity.

Although we know much about the reaction/surface
area metrics of catalytic action the relativistic
theory strongly suggests the engine behind these
catalytic properties is based on Casimir geometry.
An Inconvenient Truth
John Coleman Speaks About
Global Warming
The founder of The Weather Channel speaks out
against global warming. See coverage of the 2008
International Conference on Climate Change in
The New American magazine
Part 1 Interview with John Coleman
Part 2 An Interview with John Coleman
Part 3 An Interview with John Coleman
Part 4 An Interview with John Colman
And We Open the Gates.
From “Sancta” series. 1922  
Tempera on canvas. 71 x 101.5 cm. N.Roerich
International Centre-Museum, Moscow

Nicholas Roerich
 (Nikolai Rerikh in Russian) is generally known for
his paintings (of which there are around 7,000) but
he was also a philosopher, archaeologist,
educationalist, writer and cultural leader. He was
involved in the building of the first Buddhist
Temple in Russia in St Petersburg. He had also
studied far eastern wisdom (primarily via the
teachings of Swami Vivekananda) and the ancient
wisdom teachings via the Theosophical teachings
(alongside other adherents of Theosophy such as
Mondrian, Kandinsky and, in fact, hundreds of
painters at the start of the twentieth century)
brought to the world primarily through his Russian
compatriot Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. In
fact, Roerich, alongside his wife Helena Roerich,
was the first person to translate Blavatsky's THE
SECRET DOCTRINE into Russian. This is a major
work said to be guided by certain Masters of the
White Lodge or otherwise known as the Trans-
Himalayan occult brotherhood. The Theosophical
Society is nonsectarian, nonpolitical and
nondogmatic. Its three declared objects are:
     To form a nucleus of the universal brotherhood
of humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex,
caste or colour.   To encourage the comparative
study of religion, philosophy and science. And, To
investigate unexplained laws of nature and the
powers latent in humanity.
For more on the Theosophical Society visit their
site by clicking HERE  
Harrison Bergeron (1995)












Welcome to the future.
It's a no-brainer. "All men are not created equal. It
is the purpose of the Government to make them
so." This is the premise of the Showtime film
adaption of Kurt Vonnegut's futuristic short story
Harrison Bergeron. The film centers around a
young man (Harrison) who is smarter than his
peers, and is not affected by the usual
"Handicapping" which is used to train all
Americans so everyone is of equal intelligence.
Directed by Bruce Pittman. Screenplay by Arthur
Crimm Original Short-Story by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Starring : Sean Astin Christopher Plummer
Miranda de Pencier Eugene Levy Howie Mandel
Hayden Christensen Sadly, this movie never
made it to DVD, so we offer up the best quality
version: capped from a 1995 VHS recording made
of a Showtime broadcast [which makes this copy
a public good]. Good quality with clear audio. You
can read the original short story, in it's entirety,
here -